Multi-Sig vs MPC Wallets: A Comprehensive Guide for Institutions (2024)

Traditional digital wallets often rely on a single private key to control access to assets. This approach introduces a single point of failure, making the wallet vulnerable if the private key is lost, stolen, or compromised. 

Multi-sig and MPC wallets address this vulnerability by employing security mechanisms that distribute control and enhance protection against unauthorized access.

This article will focus on Multi-signature (multi-sig) and multi-party computation (MPC) wallets,  exploring their unique characteristics, similarities, and limitations. By understanding the key differences between these two technologies, institutions can make informed decisions about the most appropriate wallet solution for their specific needs and security requirements.

What are Single-Signature Wallets?

Single-signature wallets represent the simplest form of a cryptocurrency wallet. These wallets operate on a straightforward principle: one private key grants complete control over the associated funds. This key acts as the single signature required to authorize any movement of funds, making these wallets easy to use but also introducing certain vulnerabilities: 

• Single Point of Failure: These wallets rely on a single private key, which means that there is a single point of failure. The entire wallet balance is at risk if this key is compromised—whether through theft, loss, or forgotten passwords. Unlike traditional financial systems with backup options and fraud protection, losing your private key in a single-signature wallet often means irreversible loss of funds.
• Lack of Shared Access: Single-signature wallets cannot share access or control. There’s no mechanism for delegating partial access or requiring multiple approvals for transactions. This makes them unsuitable for organizations, groups, or any situation where collaborative financial management is desired.

While convenient for individual users with smaller holdings, the inherent risks and lack of flexibility render single-signature wallets inadequate for institutions or scenarios demanding enhanced security and shared control.

What is a Multi-Sig Wallet?

While traditional cryptocurrency wallets rely on a single private key for transaction authorization, multisig wallets introduce a more robust security model requiring multiple private keys (cosigners) to sign off on any action. This fundamental shift addresses the vulnerabilities of single-signature wallets, enhancing both security and enabling collaborative control.

Imagine a vault with multiple locks, each requiring a different key to open. That’s essentially how a multisig wallet functions. Instead of a single point of failure, these wallets employ a system where multiple authorized individuals must agree and digitally sign a transaction before it can be executed.

The technology behind multisig wallets is not recent; it was first used with cryptocurrency in 2012 for a Bitcoin transaction using a pay-to-script-hash (P2SH) address type. The first multisig wallet emerged a year later, in 2013.

How Multisig Wallets Work

At the heart of multisig wallets lies the “M-of-N” principle. This algorithm defines the number of signatures (M) required out of the total number of possible keys (N) for a transaction to be valid and broadcasted to the blockchain. For instance, a 3-of-5 multisig wallet would require three out of the five designated keys to sign a transaction before it’s executed.

This M-of-N mechanism not only enhances security but also facilitates recovery from lost private keys, provided that the remaining signatures meet the required threshold (M). Moreover, these keys can be stored on separate devices, even in different geographical locations, adding another layer of protection against theft or loss.

Transaction Flow in Multisig Wallets

The process of executing a transaction through a multisig wallet involves several steps:

• Wallet Address Generation: A multisig wallet address is created from the public keys of the authorized signers.
• Transaction Proposal: A transaction proposal is crafted, detailing the recipient’s address and the amount to be transferred.
• Review and Sign: The cosigners review the proposal and either approve or reject it.
• Transaction Authorization: Once the required number of signatures (M) is obtained, the transaction is authorized.
• Broadcast to Blockchain: The authorized transaction, complete with signature data, is broadcasted to the blockchain for validation and inclusion in a block.

What is MPC?

Multi-Party Computation (MPC), often abbreviated as MPC, is a revolutionary cryptographic technique that enables collaborative computation among multiple parties without compromising the confidentiality of their individual inputs. Imagine a group needing to calculate their average salary without anyone revealing their own earnings. MPC allows for precisely that – secure, collaborative computation without exposing private data.

In the context of wallets, MPC allows a private key to be fragmented and distributed among multiple parties, enhancing security and mitigating the risk associated with a single point of failure.

The underlying technology of MPC involves complex algorithms that ensure the secure sharing and processing of data. These algorithms are designed to perform operations in a way that the individual components of the data cannot be isolated or retrieved by other participants, thereby safeguarding sensitive information.

What are MPC wallets?

MPC wallets leverage the power of Multi-Party Computation (MPC) to safeguard private keys. Unlike multisig wallets that utilize multiple complete keys, MPC wallets take a different route; they fragment a single private key into multiple shares distributed among designated parties.

No single party holds the complete key. Instead, a predetermined threshold of shares is required to reconstruct the key and authorize a transaction. This threshold, defined during wallet creation, dictates the minimum number of shares needed for approval, ensuring security and flexibility.

For instance, a 5-of-9 MPC wallet would require five of the nine shares to come together for transaction signing. This approach eliminates the single point of failure inherent in single-key wallets while offering more agility than traditional multisig solutions. 

Approval Quorum and Flexibility

An essential aspect of MPC wallets is the approval quorum, which specifies the minimum number of signatures needed to validate a transaction. Some systems also define the sequence in which these signatures must be received. 

The approval quorum can be adjusted over time without needing a new wallet setup, adapting to evolving organizational needs or security requirements.

Furthermore, MPC wallets enhance privacy. Since the complete private key is never reconstructed in one place, sensitive information remains protected throughout the transaction process. Each party performs computations on their share without revealing it to others, ensuring confidentiality and mitigating the risk of key compromise.

Looking to upgrade to an MPC-based institutional wallet platform?

Book a demo with us today!

Similarities Between MPC & Multi-Sig

While MPC and Multi-sig wallets differ in their underlying mechanisms, they share several core similarities that make them both compelling solutions for institutions seeking enhanced security and control over digital assets:

• Distributed Control: Both technologies empower organizations to distribute wallet access and control among multiple parties or entities. This decentralization proves particularly valuable in institutional settings where transaction decisions require collective approval, minimizing the risk of unauthorized actions or internal fraud.
• Resilience to Compromise: MPC and Multi-sig wallets have greater resilience against attacks or breaches by design. Even if some participants or keys are compromised, the system’s overall security remains intact, provided a sufficient number of participants or signatures remain valid. This inherent redundancy makes these wallets significantly more secure than single-key solutions.
• Trust Minimization: Both technologies contribute to minimizing the level of trust required among participants. By distributing control and employing cryptographic algorithms, MPC and Multi-sig enable parties to collaborate and transact securely without requiring absolute trust in one another. This characteristic proves particularly valuable in complex organizational structures or when dealing with external partners.
• Flexibility: Both MPC and Multi-sig offer a high degree of customization to align with specific security needs and operational processes. Institutions can tailor the number of participants or signatures required for transaction authorization, as well as select preferred cryptographic algorithms and protocols.

Limitations of Multi-Sig wallets

Despite offering enhanced security compared to single-key wallets, multisig solutions present certain limitations that institutions should carefully consider:

• Not Protocol Agnostic: Multi-sig wallets are not blockchain agnostic and can only be used with specific blockchains.  Not every cryptocurrency protocol supports Multi-Sig functionality, and even among those that do, the implementations are not the same. This limitation means that businesses will need multiple wallet solutions to store assets across various blockchains.
  
• Operational Complexity: As institutions grow and evolve, the processes for accessing and transferring digital assets may need adjustments. This could involve changing the number of members required to sign a transaction, adding or revoking key shares, or modifying the threshold for transaction signing. However, Multi-Sig wallets are often pre-configured, making these adjustments challenging and less flexible.
• Transparency Concerns: The public nature of blockchain transactions means that multi-sig signatures are broadcast and recorded on the blockchain. This transparency can expose information about the other signatories involved and the approval quorum required, potentially attracting unwanted attention from malicious actors.
• Higher Transaction Costs: Addresses are generated on-chain meaning every wallet creation, address creation, signature, etc. have to be broadcasted to the blockchain and this requires a transaction fee for each interaction.

Benefits of MPC Wallets

MPC (Multi-Party Computation) wallets offer a range of features that address many of the shortcomings found in Multi-Sig wallets, making them an increasingly popular choice for managing digital assets. Here are some of the key benefits of MPC wallets:

• Flexible Multi Chain Support: MPC wallets are inherently blockchain-agnostic, meaning they can seamlessly support a wide range of blockchains that utilize ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) or EdDSA (Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) cryptography. Unlike Multi-sig, which often requires protocol-specific implementations, a single MPC wallet can manage assets across multiple blockchains.
• Enhanced Privacy: MPC wallets prioritize privacy by ensuring that only a single private key signature is broadcast to the blockchain for transaction confirmation. All other computations occur off-chain, shielding sensitive information from public view. Hackers cannot discern the identities of other signatories or the approval quorum required, making MPC wallets ideal for institutions prioritizing confidentiality.
• Key Recovery Mechanisms: MPC wallets offer key recovery mechanisms, a feature often absent in traditional multi-sig solutions. This functionality provides a safety net for institutions, allowing for key recovery in case of loss or compromise, further enhancing the security and usability of MPC wallets.
• Low Gas Fees and Increased Transaction Speed: MPC wallets can significantly reduce gas fees associated with blockchain transactions. Since the complex computation happens off-chain, the transaction broadcasted to the blockchain for confirmation at the end is small. This smaller transaction size incentivizes miners to prioritize these transactions, leading to faster processing and lower fees.

MPC vs. Multi-Sig breakdown

MPC or Multi-Sig: Which Wallet Is Ideal For Institutions?

Comparing MPC wallets with multisig wallets highlights their unique and shared benefits. They both distribute control, but MPC splits the private key itself, strengthening security by removing single points of failure. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to the specific needs and preferences of the organization or users involved.

MPC wallets are well-suited for institutions such as exchanges, hedge funds, crypto funds, venture capital firms, market makers, trading firms, Web3 projects, treasuries and family offices. These entities benefit from the advanced security, privacy, and operational efficiency of MPC wallets, making them ideal for managing high volumes of transactions and assets across multiple blockchains.

On the other hand, Multi-Sig wallets may be more appropriate for web3 protocols, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and government bodies as decision-making is often decentralized and transparency of signatories is less of a concern.

That said, Utila—the best MPC wallet for institutions—is leveraging robust MPC architecture to provide best-in-class secure, self-custodial, chain-agnostic, crypto wallet infrastructure for institutions.

Get started by booking a demo now!